Welcome Guest | Login | Register | Why Register? |
Newsletter RSS Twitter
30 July 2010 | 11:51 GMT


HOME | CONTACT | NEWS | DOCUMENT LIBRARY | FEATURES | OPINION & ANALYSIS | EVENTS | RESEARCH REPORTS | CASE STUDIES
View reders comments View (4)
comments
Add a comment Add a
comment
Send to a friend Send to
a friend
Print this page Print

Danish GPs enjoy the best IT systems, says study

Tags: Government   GP   GPs   Informatics   New Zealand   QoF   Quality   Scotland  

06 Oct 2006

Denmark is the most advanced country in the world for clinical information technology systems in primary care, health informatics luminary Professor Denis Protti has stated.

Danish GPs are used to sending one another clinical information over their secure network; over 90% of clinical communications are exchanged in this way. The study estimated only 41 GPs in the whole country were not connected to the network.

"The Danes are paid to go out and spend time with other GPs to learn about technology," explained Professor Protti.

Benefits are enjoyed by patients as well as clinicians in the country. For instance, a national online health portal, set up in 2005, provides information to patients about waiting list information and allows them to schedule GP appointments, renew prescriptions and access their own health records – including an audit of who has viewed them.

Patients in Denmark can also contact their GPs by e-mail for medical advice. GPs are paid twice the amount for e-mail consultations as they are for phone, which Protti argued greatly increased adoption rates.

The study, which was presented by Professor Protti at his inaugural lecture at City University, London, was originally commissioned by Canada Health InfoWay, the federal government agency set up to foster adoption of electronic health records across Canada. It aimed to find out the causes behind widescale IT adoption in general practice and what benefits can accrue from its use.

Ten countries – Australia, Austria, Denmark, England, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Scotland and Sweden – were analysed. Although the countries were not ranked for their level of clinical IT adoption, Professor Protti said that Denmark was probably the best out of all of them, with New Zealand closely behind.

Primary care IT in England was singled out for its work on its pay for performance scheme, the Quality and Outcomes Framework. Protti argued that QOF had done a great deal to prioritise entry of clinical data into computer systems as opposed to handwritten notes.

Scottish GPs were named along Danish and New Zealanders as being most capable of receiving and processing laboratory reports.

There was no one single thread that indicated widespread adoption of IT in primary care, the study concluded, although Protti noted that smaller countries tended to be more successful than larger ones.

"In North America our physicians are significantly behind most of the rest of the world in the use of technology," Protti commented at the beginning of his lecture, adding that a recent study that concluded 22% of GPs in the continent frequently used clinical IT systems was considered "generous".

A large variety of organisation types, both public and private sector, were responsible for seeing through healthcare IT reform across the world, said Protti: "Denmark has a non-profit organisation, at arms-length from government." New Zealand, on the other hand, operated its healthcare IT project through a wholly private company. What mattered was that a unifying organisation was responsible, as well as some kind of government impetus.

However, Protti stressed that GPs were crucial for the successful implementation of healthcare IT in general. "What seems clear in all ten countries is the recognition that significant progress towards an Electronic Health Record, with all its potential to improve clinical outcomes, is impossible without the full participation of general practitioners."

The quality and availability of data was "tremendously variable" from country to country, ranging from small sample sizes and anecdotes to comprehensive feedback. Further research was needed in many cases, he said.

Professor Protti is holding the position of chair of health informatics at City University between 1 September and 30 November, and is to be visiting professor in 2008.

© 2006 E-HEALTH-MEDIA LTD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Reader's Comments
Add a comment
Reader's Comments

1

Health IT in the USA

06 Oct 06 09:10

Perhaps I'm missing something here, but if North America is significantly behind the rest of the (? developed) world in its use of clinical IT systems, why is the NHS investing so heavily in systems and standards from the US, e.g. Cerner, SNOMED, HL7 etc?


2

Denmark's secure network

M.Teague@ukerna.ac.uk

06 Oct 06 11:10

Denmark have an impressive approach and the secure network mentioned makes use of VPN agreements over the national Education and Research Network ie the equivalent of JANET in the UK (treated as the internet in terms of security). They have an agreement system which manages the workflow for firewall administrators to agree firewall configurations to allow links and these are automatically documented. The system is available for use by other countries and the whole of Scandinavia use the health network in this way even though say Sweden has a dedicated health network more like N3.

If you are interested in this then Martin Bech will be presenting at the next NHS-Higher Education Forum on 9th November at the Royal College of Obs & Gynae in London. Further details at www.nhs-he.org.uk. NHS colleagues welcome.

You can also see a copy of a past presentation at http://tinyurl.com/qy8xs.


3

Consistency of approach

09 Oct 06 10:10

Part of the success of Denmark has to be their determination to look to supporting the fundamental clinical flows, rather than the ever changing and transient political gaming in the UK, and using the IT gently to move users towards a desired goal rather than to try and radically change the system in one big bang.

And the USA is the last place I would have gone for the basis of patient centred, community focussed record systems, that is entirely due to the aggregation of demands for England to such a degree that only the biggest (slowest, and least innovative) players could respond.


4

Moaners, whiners and losers.

10 Oct 06 13:10

The medical systems in the majority of US hospitals are considered to be cutting edge technology, however the point being made here is that if something remarkable is made in a country that doesn't imply that the country is considered to be the best in that area around the world.

French railways are considered one of the best in the world but the best train manufacturer is based in Canada - doh. (Post edited by EHI)

Search
News Features Jobs Newsletters
EHI Primary Care Tweets
EHI Primary Care Tweets

Featured_recruiters
Featured_recruiters