Welcome Guest | Login | Register | Why Register? |
Newsletter RSS Twitter
15 March 2010 | 13:17 GMT


HOME | CONTACT | NEWS | DOCUMENT LIBRARY | FEATURES | OPINION & ANALYSIS | EVENTS | RESEARCH REPORTS | CASE STUDIES

London SCR roll out complete in a year

Tags: AIM   GPs   London   LPfIT   NHS London   NHS Yorkshire and Humber   PCTs   SCR  

09 Feb 2010

The summary care record roll out

NHS London is aiming to create Summary Care Records for 100% of the people living in the capital that want one by March 2011.

This week, the strategic health authority kicked off its ambitious roll-out strategy by launching its Public Information Programme for 1.5m Londoners in five primary care trusts.

NHS London told EHI Primary Care that Public Information Programmes (PIPs) for the rest of the capital’s residents will be launched shortly, with the aim of ensuring that all patients in London will have received information about the SCR by mid-April.

Londonwide Local Medical Committees told GPs this week that the letter will tell patients to ‘inform their GP’ in they wish to opt out.

The LMC said it continued to raise concerns with the London Programme for IT about the impact of the patient letter on practices and “any potential activity around FP69s [patients for whom the letter is returned as not known].”

NHS London is one of five SHAs that have been given money by the Department of Health to run PIPs, on the proviso that the money must be used by the end of March.

The SHAs, covering half of England, want to see SCRs created for most of their residents in the next 12 months.

NHS East of England is aiming for universal roll-out of the SCR by the end of 2010 and EHI Primary Care understands that NHS Yorkshire and Humber wants to see SCRs created for 70% of its patients by the end of March next year.

Tony Megaw, assistant chief information officer for NHS Yorkshire and Humber, said all 14 PCTs have taken advantage of DH central funding to run PIPs by April.

He added: "NHS Yorkshire and the Humber are very supportive of the Summary Care Record Programme and are keen to accelerate SCR deployments to achieve early realisation of patient benefits with a particular focus on supporting urgent care services and end of life care." 

 In a letter to PCT chief executives and IT directors in December, Kevin Jarrold, chief information officer for NHS London, said that without DH funding the cost to London of running PIPs would be £7m.

He said the SHA had secured funding for a London-wide PIP programme on the basis that the PIPs were completed by the end of March 2010 and all record uploaded onto the system by March 2011.

He added: “As well as increasing the pace of activity in the capital this would also enable the NHS in London to make some significant savings.”

Jarrold said the SHA had decided to rollout the PIPs across London in three waves. The first wave will target patients in the Outer North East London and South East London sectors.

These will be followed by Inner North East London and North Central London and finally North West London and South West London.

Jarrold said there would be one standard patient letter for patients in London which could be tailored by PCTs and signed by each PCT chief executive officer.

The five PCTs which have sent out letters to patients this week are NHS Bexley, Bromley, Greenwich, Southwark and Waltham Forest.

Dr Phil Koczan, a GP and clinical lead for the London Programme for IT, said that in his experience unconnected care caused “untold and unnecessary angst at often very difficult times for my patients”.

He added: “The summary care record provides easy access to patient information. It improves patient safety, avoids duplication of tests and improves access to essential patient data during episodes of urgent or unscheduled care.

"For many patients, making this information available is common sense and they are surprised it doesn’t happen already.”

Fiona Barr

Related Articles
Related Articles

© 2010 E-HEALTH-MEDIA LTD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Reader's Comments
Add a comment
Reader's Comments

1

also complete in a year....

09 Feb 10 20:02

....I heard the other day that the 3rd runway at Heathrow will be finished, just in time to cope with the increased number of airborne swine


2

100% so no opt out allowed?

11 Feb 10 10:02

So NHS London wants 100% of records on the spine. What about those who want to opt out - is this not to be allowed in London? How else will they achieve their target?


3

Re. 100%

11 Feb 10 12:02

In a strict sense, 100% isn't realistic, but in Early Adopters so far, opt-out is running at significantly less than 1%.


4

SCR in the North West

11 Feb 10 23:02

Thankfully elsewhere in the country common sense has prevailed. NHS Cumbria (aka PCT) postponed roll out of the SCR with no future date set. No one had bothered to ask patients or GP's (who will shoulder much of the administrative burden) whether to proceed.

It would be interesting to find out how many of the pilot PCTs required indivdual GP practices (with separate databases) to make an active decision to upload data. It is also worth knowing if the GP practices knew that to improve on the limited data proposed in the current roll out, they will have to run templates on individual patients to then upload, a time consuming process-if that functionality ever appears.

Surely any GP practice running EMIS or Vision would be far better served by utilising what either exists currently re data sharing (consent to view) or what will be arriving later this year with the fabled MIG.

Communicating clinical information between Primary and Secondary Care is not rocket science. The software has been written, the technical issues straightforward. If empire buildling could be halted and egos controlled then all this is fixable and guess what-the patient gets better care.

 


5

Misinformation Abounds

david.hill@primis.nottingham.ac.uk

12 Feb 10 09:02

I saw a London PIP letter (received in the post) yesterday at an SCRS awareness event, it strongly advised the patient not to contact their practice but to call the National Helpline number. Practices were encouraged to pass enquiries straight to this number or the PCT helpline if any of their patients or LMC members didnt get as far as reading that bit . 


6

2nd poster is wrong

13 Feb 10 11:02

The second poster should read the first parapgraph of the report and note the words "that want one" in the description of the scope of the aim.


7

What else is London planning?

maryhawking@tigers.demon.co.uk

14 Feb 10 20:02

While I appreciate the incentive placed on SHAs and PCTs to get letters out to patients before the end of March - or to receive no funding - surely there are other considerations apart from ticking boxes to show that you - as a PCO - have x% of patients either accepting a SCR or actually having one?

 

An SCR by itself does **absolutely nothing** to improve communication and/or patient safety/admission avoidance **IF there is NO system in the services where it is supposed to be used!**! i.e. emergency services (e.g. ambulance and some social services), OOH and A&E and secondary care after admission.

 

So what are London and East of England (and other SHAs) planning to do about the user end of SCRs?

 

Search
News Features Jobs Newsletters

Featured_recruiters
Featured_recruiters