Welcome Guest | Login | Register | Why Register? |
Newsletter RSS Twitter
03 September 2010 | 16:51 GMT


HOME | CONTACT | NEWS | DOCUMENT LIBRARY | FEATURES | OPINION & ANALYSIS | EVENTS | RESEARCH REPORTS | CASE STUDIES
View reders comments View (4)
comments
Add a comment Add a
comment
Send to a friend Send to
a friend
Print this page Print

Kelsey - info should be compulsory

Tags: Community   Conservatives   E-Health Insider Live 09   Government   GPs   Infrastructure   NHS Choices   Social care   website  

09 Nov 2009

GPs and all other NHS providers should be mandated to publish routine, standardised data on their outcomes, according to the chairman of health information firm Dr Foster.

Tim Kelsey told E-Health Insider Live ’09 that only English hospitals currently publish outcomes data and the next government should ‘force the pace.’

He said a future government should ensure the data infrastructure also covered mental health, community care, social care and most importantly primary care.

“We have literally no idea about quality of outcomes in primary care,” he said.

“GPs do have to compile Quality and Outcomes Framework data but in my view and many others QoF does not constitute a proper insight into outcomes.”

Kelsey said GPs should publish weekly information on their websites, including the patient experience ratings they had received in the previous seven days.

He argued that doctors needed to be incentivised to publish data which he said could be taken straight from the information they provide for revalidation.

Kelsey was brought in by the Department of Health to set up NHS Choices and said an audit carried out during the development phase found more than 50% of the information on the website that preceded it was inaccurate.

“You wouldn’t use Expedia if you knew the flight times or the destinations were wrong and yet poor quality information is extremely common in the NHS.”

Kelsey said his website, Dr Foster, and mortality data released by the DH last year made England ‘a world leader’ on the publication of hospital outcomes information. In contrast, he said countries that were still refusing to publish information included Wales, the US, Italy and Spain.

However, he said he was hopeful that if the Conservatives are elected in England next year they will introduce a consumer revolution. To support it, he called on any future government to mandate the publication of detailed standardised outcome information on a monthly basis.

He said central government needed to leave the local NHS to innovate rather than trying to deliver top-down solutions and that a market needed to be created for smaller, innovative businesses to be able to deliver their services in the NHS.

He added: “We as patients and citizens also need to refuse to tolerate the kind of Victorian-type practices that we come across in the NHS. The NHS needs to treat us like consumers and engage with us more personally.”

“If people refuse they should simply not be allowed to treat patients in the NHS,” he added.

He said the obstacles he identified included concern over data sharing, poor quality data and a lack of capability in the NHS.

He added: “I recently interviewed 20 or so primary care trust chief executives, and although they all identified the importance of the digital agenda almost all of them had no idea where to start."

 

 

Fiona Barr

Related Articles
Related Articles

© 2009 E-HEALTH-MEDIA LTD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Reader's Comments
Add a comment
Reader's Comments

1

Outcome data in Primary Care

daryl.mullen@nhs.net

13 Nov 09 10:11

So Tim illuminate us precisely which outcome data should I a GP be publishing?

If it sounds resonable I'll do it.


2

How do you measure outcomes?

maryhawking@tigers.demon.co.uk

13 Nov 09 14:11

Most of the preventative work GPs do may be reflected in outcomes several years down the line - and may (or may not) be attributable to one particular piece of advice/diagnosis/treatment. Take Scotland: a third reduction in hospital admissions with myocardial infarcts in the first year after the ban on smoking in public places. A triumph for Scottish general practice? Or just a triumph for Evidence Based Public Health?


3

No idea

16 Nov 09 09:11

It just goes to show that this man has no knowledge of what primary care is all about. It would be laughable except this is coming from a Government advisor.


4

The Victorians got some of it right

24 Nov 09 14:11

Kelsey wants us to pander to the consumers wishes? (Or are they just a proxy to his desire to collect data on everything?) Does the consumer know what is good for him? Depends on how much he knows. A third of the population of the UK are so scientifically illiterate that they don't believe global warming is ocurring. But I am sure they all know what makes the difference between a good and a bad doctor, don't they?
Back to my point; consumers activity can be measured by their consumption, can't it? And as every Victorian knew, consumption is very unhealthy. Maybe the Victorians knew something then, Mr Kelsey. Know what I mean? I doubt you do!

Search
News Features Jobs Newsletters
EHI Primary Care Tweets
EHI Primary Care Tweets

Featured_recruiters
Featured_recruiters