Welcome Guest | Login | Register | Why Register? |
Newsletter RSS Twitter
14 March 2010 | 03:25 GMT


HOME | CONTACT | NEWS | DOCUMENT LIBRARY | FEATURES | OPINION & ANALYSIS | EVENTS | RESEARCH REPORTS | CASE STUDIES

Tories promise records for all

Tags: DH   Google Health   GP   Health Vault   NPfIT   PCTs   Telehealth  

02 Nov 2009

Patient-held records are one of the Conservative Party's priorities for health, according to plans published today.

The party said it would carry out a full consultation on how to move to patient-held records with a view to introducing them throughout the NHS.

In a speech at the Royal College of Pathologists, party leader David Cameron said patient-held records would put patients in control and allow resources to be pushed from bureaucrats to professionals and patients.

He added: “When Labour were deciding how to store people’s health record, they commissioned a massive, bureaucratic IT project and spent billions of pounds on a centralised database.

“Our approach is to say that today, in the post-bureaucratic age, you don’t need a massive central computer to do this.”

Cameron said ‘one option’ would be for patients to store their health records online although he did not refer to commercial health platforms such as Google Health and Microsft’s HealthVault which have been widely mooted in connection with his party's health plans.

The proposals published today indicate that the Conservatives want a system wide reform of the NHS, focusing on five priorities: creating a patient-led NHS, measuring health outcomes, putting healthcare professionals in charge of delivering care, focusing government action on improving public health and reforming long-term care.

Priorities include a pledge to ‘restructure’ Choose and Book to enable all referrals to be made to a named consultant - an option that is currently left to individual trust departments to activate - and to widen the number of providers on the system.

The published priorities do not include any further detail on the Conservatives' plans to dismantle the National Programme for IT in the NHS' central infrastructure, as outlined earlier this year.

However, Cameron said foundation trusts would be given greater powers and freedom and that foundation status would be extended to cover all NHS providers. Private and voluntary sector providers will be allowed to compete for NHS contracts.

GPs will also be given control over real commissioning budgets in what sounds like a return to fundholding, with GP practices allowed to reinvest any savings made on their budgets.

Cameron also pledged to renegotiate the GP contract and open up primary care to new providers as well as scrapping all NHS targets. He claimed these had led to too much bureaucracy and to clinical judgements being undermined.

He added: “With a Conservative government, our professionals will experience a level of freedom the like of which most will not have known before.”

He said professionals would be made accountable through the publication online of detailed performance information for every hospital, including outcome data. He also said Payment by Results would be extended.

On long–term care, the Conservatives say people will be helped to stay in their own homes through through new initiatives, including more telehealth and telemedicine pilots followed by full national roll-out.

The Conservatives also reaffirmed a long standing policy to rename the Department of Health the Department of Public Health and to introduce ring-fenced public health budgets for PCTs and councils.

Todays plans say a further 4,200 health visitors will be recruited and that a new public health strategy, aimed at improving exercise and diet and reducing alcohol abuse, will be created.

Link: David Cameron's speech on the Conservative Party website

Fiona Barr

Related Articles
Related Articles

© 2009 E-HEALTH-MEDIA LTD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Reader's Comments
Add a comment
Reader's Comments

1

Is Dave thick or ill informed

02 Nov 09 17:11

Dave

When Labour were deciding how to store people’s health record, they commissioned a massive, bureaucratic IT project and spent billions of pounds on a centralised database. No they did'nt they have Trust systems linked to the spine

There are alteady simple record systems such as SAP; Dave this is so much nonsense. Just spin that the normal man on the street will take on board.

If you don not know what you are talking about keep quiet!!!


2

Oi Dave - Nooooooo!

03 Nov 09 10:11

A personal medical record can only ever be a summary and whilst it might be useful in some circumstances certainly is not the answer to managing hospitals or care pathways.

We will still need hospital and GP/Community EPRs. How on earth does Dave think we are going to manage patients. Does he really envisage a free for all whereby anyone can just wander in to a hospital with a login credential or memory stick! Are we going to be able to incorporate this random dataset into our processes, start communicating with each other and scheduling services like physio, radiology and laboratory on the back of it. Are we going to do this in a consistent and quality way using robust interfacing.

This is so far off the mark it's not even funny. In fact it's the kind of thing that you could easily spend another £12Bn on if you were some hapless politician.


3

Passenger centred air-traffic control system

03 Nov 09 11:11

Passenger_ID : Departure_Airport_ID : Destination_Airport_ID

Job's done - what was all the fuss about? Google could do this for free %-)

The "patient centred record" is a similar delusion. It's painstakingly politically correct but woefully lacking in insight.

Medical records and administration systems exist primarily to enable institutions and staff to manage patients safely and efficiently.

There's relatively little of direct interest the patient: much less would it desirable to let them loose on the controls in the majority of instances.

 

 


4

A distributed, web-based careflow system is certainly possible

philgooch@gmail.com

04 Nov 09 09:11

The GoogleHealth API is REST based so it could certainly be part of a distributed, web-based, care pathway-driven EHR.

Patient-centred doesn't mean the patients control the the underlying messages or systems, any more than they do when they purchase something from an online seller who uses the PayPal API.

Search
News Features Jobs Newsletters

Featured_recruiters
Featured_recruiters