Welcome Guest | Login | Register | Why Register? |
Newsletter RSS Twitter
17 March 2010 | 06:28 GMT


HOME | CONTACT | NEWS | DOCUMENT LIBRARY | FEATURES | OPINION & ANALYSIS | EVENTS | RESEARCH REPORTS | CASE STUDIES

HealthSpace expansion plans shelved

Tags: AIM   CfH   DH   Google   Google Health   GP   HealthSpace   Informatics   London   NHS Choices   repeat prescriptions   SCR   Solution   Telehealth  

16 Jun 2009

The Department of Health has shelved plans for a massive expansion of its personal health record project, HealthSpace.

HealthSpace was conceived as a way to allow people to access and eventually add to a version of their Summary Care Records. But like the national SCR project, it has suffered from lengthy delays.

An £80m-plus business case, that was due to be submitted to the Treasury, now appears to have been kicked into the long grass. Most of the team working on HealthSpace has been stood down and released for other work, with just a skeleton crew retained.

Last year’s Health Informatics Review outlined a wide-ranging role for HealthSpace, but the DH has now done a U-turn and demanded more evidence of the site’s value to patients before pushing ahead with further expansion.

Plans for HealthSpace were based on making it a hub for transactional services, so patients could book nurse or GP appointment, manage long-term conditions, order repeat prescriptions or medication reviews and complete pre-registration assessments online.

Other planned services included access to letters and test results and access to data sent through telehealth devices.

Low take-up of the services currently offered by HealthSpace has done little to promote the portal’s cause.

Figures released to GP Dr Neil Bhatia under the Freedom of Information Act show that out of more than 250,000 records created, just 812 people had activated an advanced HealthSpace account and only 437 had accessed their SCR.

A survey conducted last year as part of the SCR independent evaluation found 60% of patients at a walk-in centre did not want a HealthSpace and 10% were uncertain.

The percentage of those not wanting a HealthSpace account rose to 87% for patients with low levels of health literacy.

The evaluation by University College London recommended that the DH focus on optimising the use of HealthSpace in specific, clearly defined scenarios such as in self care for one or two chronic conditions, before attempting to offer it to NHS patients more generally.

In a statement issued to EHI Primary Care, the DH said "HealthSpace has entered a phase of evaluating patient experience of its services and assessing what extra offerings should be made available in the future.

“Pilots of the HealthSpace Communicator function, which enables secure communication between clinicians and patients, are beginning to run at sites across England.”

The statement added: “These aim to establish its value for both patients and clinicians in different care settings on how best to develop the service. HealthSpace should be based on what patients want, rather than an expectation of what they need.

“This period of time is crucial to developing the future directions for the service and involves a redistribution of current resources, including staff, so that efforts are directed appropriately.”

An outline business case worth £80m to £90m – one source puts the figure at £98m - had been developed by CfH, which was to have been submitted to the Treasury earlier this year.

However, the DH is understood to have spiked the business case, seeking more evidence for the value of HealthSpace, which has not received the backing of Christine Connelly, director general of informatics.

Dr Neil Bacon, founder of the doctors’ website doctors.net and the patient website iwantgreatcare.org, said he was unsurprised that the DH had shelved its plans.

“I think this is their way of quietly getting rid of it,” he told EHI Primary Care. “In the commercial world, if a solution with more than 250,000 potential users had only been used by 400 people it would already have been put out of its misery.”

Dr Bacon said he believed there was a clear and growing demand for patients to manage their own health records but that innovative, entrepreneurial solutions rather than government-led solutions would meet that demand.

He said “trusted brand names” in the UK were already working on solutions which might tie in with the worldwide personal health record services such as Google Health and Microsoft HealthVault.

John Coulthard, head of Microsoft’s UK health team, said: “The innovation in the health space - not HealthSpace - is going to come from a number of organisations, many of which are outside government, such as social care, charities and the commercial sector.”

Dr Paul Hodkgin, founder of Patient Opinion, said he was also not surprised that future plans for HealthSpace were on hold.

He said: “It’s one of those obvious ideas that is incredibly difficult to implement and there are interesting alternatives to these monolithic solutions.”

However, Dr Amir Hannan, a GP who has pioneered patient access to records and a member of the HealthSpace Reference Panel, said he remained optimistic about the future of patient access to records in the UK.

He told EHI Primary Care: “Patients need to be able to see the information that’s stored on them and I believe there is a lot of support for that nationally.”

Fiona Barr

Related Articles
Related Articles

© 2009 E-HEALTH-MEDIA LTD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Reader's Comments
Add a comment
Reader's Comments

1

The white elephant (not) in the room

16 Jun 09 08:06

Looking back at the Output Based Specifications -  the vision was for HealthSpace to run off the back of a rich and sophisticated centralised clinical record (PSIS) and interface directly with all spine connected electronic medical record systems. 

The minimal read-only GP Summary Care Record being slowly rolled out now is not the Integrated Care Record Service we were promised.

We appear to have lost the icing - what happened to the cake?
 


2

The cake ....

16 Jun 09 11:06

The recipe was created (hurriedly) by committee.

A management consultant tried to oversee the baking.

No point icing the inedible result!


3

The icing

angus.goudie@GP-A89021.nhs.uk

16 Jun 09 13:06

What a shame, as the icing was of a new type that would have improved the healthiness of the rest of the cake.  We can't be sure that less integrated icing will do that nearly as well.

New concepts sometimes take time to sell, and the lack of a cake will have made the icing rather less enticing to most diners.


4

Fruitcake?

16 Jun 09 15:06

I am not sure that icing sits nicely on a fruitcake?


5

icing on fruitcakes.......

16 Jun 09 17:06

well thats what a christmas cake is..and like any fruitcake, to get the best you need it to mature and add a bit of booze...Patients need to access their records and if Healthspace does not provide the solution than other systems will.

The idea is not at fault but maybe the execution needs rethinking.


6

Dodgy stats

16 Jun 09 22:06

Well I suppose that CfH have made such a play of using statistics that it was bound to bite them in the end.

I assume the Walk-ins referred to would be in one of the (very few) pilot SCR areas. Those people coming to these sessions were either a) very keen, wanting to go through the complicated Healthspace registration, or

b) very concerned about having a SCR record.

Hardly a representative sample of the population at large.

And since the go-live of SCR records is still in its infancy even in the pilot PCTs, it would be difficult for most people to access their SCRs as they havent been uploaded.

The concept was great, but like the rest of the NPfIT programme, made far too overcomplicated and expensive. And I'm sure most patients would expect that their Healthspace would show their entire record, not a very thin summary of what they already probably know.

Ditching Healthspace now squanders the money invested so far, just when the access was becoming available.


7

the evidence

cunpr@globalnet.co.uk

17 Jun 09 12:06

The evidence from previous attempts, including mine some 9 years ago, is that what patients want is the ability to communicate, not integrate. There may be some who want full integration but the vast majority of the cohort that are comfortable with electronic communications want to be able to do the mundane labour intensiive stuff easily, efficiently, electronicaly and 24/7. So requesting or booking appointments, requesting repeat scripts, lodging questions and receiving answers and in some cases forwarding tests or measurements are the things to go for first. This is the evidence from the commercial innovators and its what patients ask for, if you ask them..

Regards

Paul C
 


8

Target market

17 Jun 09 12:06

The way I see it, the problem is at least partly to do with the way that DH (and public sector generally) evaluate business cases. For the Healthspace business case to stack up they needed hundreds of thousands of people to use it - and they're not. Most people only see their GP a couple of times a year and don't need to be able to access their health record of make use of Healthspace. However, there is a smaller percentage of the population that suffers from a long term condition, e.g. asthma, diabetes and many more, who have very regular contact with health professionals. For them Healthspace could be the ideal solution and could also be a route for delivering e-medicine and minimising the number of times they have to travel and make an appointment to see someone face to face (when often all that is needed is to record data, e.g. blood sugar levels). It's a much smaller target audience, so it's harder to make the business case stack-up, but Healthspace could have a really useful role to play here.


9

Not cancelled - just not expanded

17 Jun 09 13:06

To be clear, the article says that it's the massive expansion of HealthSpace that is being cancelled, not the project as a whole.  That means people will still have the option to view their SCR when it arrives locally.  If the national rollout of SCR drives any significant numbers, then there will still be the rump of a service that could be developed.


10

getting (a bit) serious

17 Jun 09 17:06

OK, i had my fun with an earlier comment, but this is somewhat sad, and also an indictment of the way that business cases are built in the NHS.

After all, what is the potential benefit of a site like this? It certainly isn't that 1000 or 100,000 or 1,000,000 people have looked at it. It might be that some people with complex needs have used it to log home based diagnostics. It might be that the NHS has saved time and money by not bringing people in for unnecessary treatment. It might be that a group of patients had been empowered to manage their own care.

The trouble is that these are difficult to measure and open to dispute, especially in the early stages. So instead we go for easy-to-measure-but-meaningless metrics and then wonder why the products fail to deliver

c'est la vie


11

There is another way

brian.fisher403@ntlworld.com

17 Jun 09 20:06

It is now possible for all EMIS practices to offer all their patients access online to their full GP record. It is a safe and secure service free to patients and practices. It is part of the e-suite that enables people to book appointments and repeat prescriptions online.

People not only see their data in a way that is easy to navigate, but what they see is linked to information that is accurate and hopefully soon to be formally accredited by the NHS. Automatic information prescriptions tailored to the patient's needs.

There is increasing evidence that people with full record access (not to the SCR, but to their full data) use health serivces more efficiently and effectively.

I am one of the co-directors of PAERS that, with EMIS, currently offers this comprehensive service. We would be happy to work with other providers, such as Vision, to make this available to more people.

The main limiting factor iin spread s practices who need to switch on the system but remain concerned about the impact on the practice, even though the evidence is excellent that record access enables better quality care and probably saves time.

How can we work together to ensure that this gets to all those people that would benefit from record access?

Brian Fisher


12

Usage can be high if content is valued

neil.turner@ed.ac.uk

18 Jun 09 13:06

Renal PatientView (www.renalpatientview.org) delivers results and info via a secure login on the Web for patients attending renal units. It now has over 10,000 patient registrations from half of the renal units in the UK. It is a challenging area because of the potentially important information shown, and the complicated nature of renal disease and its management. Results can be seen by patients without prior screening by clinicians. Renal disease is one of many chronic conditions where patient understanding and participation may strongly influence outcomes. We are just beginning to analyse usage, but for instance in our own unit, 22% of our 580 registered patients accessed the system a mean of 4.8 (median 2) times each during a single month (March 2009).

Renal PatientView was specified by patients and delivered by the renal community with support for development from the Departments of Health of England, Scotland and Wales, and support for installation and continuation from local units.


13

Empowering the patient

18 Jun 09 14:06

I am Gordon Brooks, site director of Patient UK. We are working with Brian and Paers. Giving patients online access to their records helps them to better understand how professionals are addressing their problems.

We provide rapid access from key points in the records to appropriate high quality information designed to help explain health risks, diseases, possible treatments and outcomes.

All this helps empower patients, so they can prepare for consultation discussion of their health, review progress at their leisure and be made aware of, and better understand, lifestyle and treatment options.

They can also look for support, share their experiences and find out about the latest research and health news in areas of interest...

Search
News Features Jobs Newsletters

Featured_recruiters
Featured_recruiters