Welcome Guest | Login | Register | Why Register? |
Newsletter RSS Twitter
03 September 2010 | 16:03 GMT


HOME | CONTACT | NEWS | DOCUMENT LIBRARY | FEATURES | OPINION & ANALYSIS | EVENTS | RESEARCH REPORTS | CASE STUDIES
View reders comments View (3)
comments
Add a comment Add a
comment
Send to a friend Send to
a friend
Print this page Print

QoF to become GQ

Tags: BMA   GP   GPs   NICE   QoF   Quality  

01 Apr 2009

The Quality and Outcomes Framework is to be renamed, EHI Primary Care has learned.

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence became responsible for QoF today and EHI primary Care understands that its first step will be to announce a rebrand for the scheme which will henceforth be known as the GQ (GP Quality) scheme.

An insider at the agency told EHI Primary Care: “We felt the old name didn’t really tell people what the scheme was all about. GQ might sound like a men’s magazine but it is also a much snappier title for the scheme.”

Other changes that NICE is thought to be considering including change the name of the ‘indicators’ to ‘trends’.

This will mean that rather than having a portion of their income based on ‘QoF indicators’ GPs will now have their performance matched to ‘GQ trends’.

It is understood the BMA has not been consulted about the proposals and is likely to oppose any name changes.

Dr Neil Paul, a GP in Sandbach, Cheshire,  told EHI Primary Care: “I don’t see what’s wrong with QoF. If I start telling my partners were doing the GQ scheme and they have to stay on top of the latest trends they’re probably going to think I’m asking them to take part in a fashion show.”

Fiona Barr

© 2009 E-HEALTH-MEDIA LTD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Reader's Comments
Add a comment
Reader's Comments

1

Misleading New Name

01 Apr 09 14:04

I'm sure that my practice manager, ancillary staff and practice nurses will not be happy with the change of name

The scheme measures practice quality, not just GP performance. Some indicators are administrative and most of the others could not be achieved without a team effort.

This development concerns me in that it suggests that NICE have a poor understanding of the nature of the scheme and how practices work. It leaves me in doubt as to whether they are the right body to oversee the future development of QOF.


2

Is it just to confuse and waste alot of money?

01 Apr 09 15:04

Juliet: What's in a name? that which we call a rose By any other name would smell as sweet; So Romeo would, were he not Romeo call'd, Retain that dear perfection which he owes Without that title.


3

lirpa loof

gareth.senior@nhs.net

01 Apr 09 16:04

I can't belive we at CFH are now going to have to change all the documentation that refers to QOF - a full time job for a year! I'm writing my letter of disgust to NICE & DH as we 'speak'

Dear NICE

1st APRIL 2009................

;-)

Search
News Features Jobs Newsletters
EHI Primary Care Tweets
EHI Primary Care Tweets

Featured_recruiters
Featured_recruiters