Welcome Guest | Login | Register | Why Register? |
Newsletter RSS Twitter
16 March 2010 | 11:04 GMT


HOME | CONTACT | NEWS | DOCUMENT LIBRARY | FEATURES | OPINION & ANALYSIS | EVENTS | RESEARCH REPORTS | CASE STUDIES

Greater Manchester extends telemedicine ECG service

Tags: GMC   GP   GPs   PCT   PCTs   reporting   Screening  

19 Jul 2007

The Greater Manchester and Cheshire Cardiac Network have successfully piloted a new telemedicine ECG service from Broomwell HealthWatch to provide expert cardiology reporting for patients and will now roll the system out to a total of almost 150 practices.

The system allows 12-lead ECGs to be carried out in the GP practice by a doctor or nurse and transmit the results to a Broohwell's cardiac centre, providing GPs with expert cardiology advice.

The Greater Manchester and Cheshire Cardiac Network is responsible for the cardiac care of 3.2m people in the region. The network has already piloted the system in 48 surgeries in the region, and will now be rolled out to a further 96 surgeries.

Broomwell’s hand-held 12-lead ECG machine is used by a nurse, clinician or paramedic in the same way as a conventional machine. When the ECG is complete, the data is transmitted as a sound signal by landline telephone in just 45 seconds to Broomwell’s monitoring centre, where it is displayed on screen for interpretation by experienced clinicians.

Based on the high-quality ECG trace, staff at Broomwell's monitoring centre give an immediate verbal interpretation by phone so that action can be taken quickly, if needed. A full written ECG report is also sent to the GP surgery by email or fax for inclusion in the patient record.

Prestwich-based GP, Dr Jonathan Lieberman, had been using the system for a couple of years and championed his PCT to take part in the pilot.

He told EHI Primary Care: “The system is great for use in diagnosing patients with chest pain symptoms. Normally, we would refer patients to the local hospital outpatients departments for an ECG to look for any signs of cardiac illness. Now I can do a test there and then in the surgery and get a telephone call to tell me the extent of the cardiac problem and if the patient needs to go to hospital or not. It’s incredibly useful.”

Dr Lieberman added: “It is a very good screening tool and is also useful for treating patients who need regular ECG tests such as those with high blood pressure. It helps save expenses for the NHS and boosts patient confidence in knowing they do not have to unnecessarily visit the hospital.”

The cardiac monitoring and response service is so far in place at four primary care trusts across the area – the North and Central districts of Manchester PCT, Stockport PCT and Bury PCT – and since its launch in September 2006 has already been used with over 1,300 patients.

A key benefit of the service to patients is that because it is carried out locally by their GP it removes the need to travel elsewhere for diagnosis. Before the introduction of the service the process used to be that a patient had to travel to an acute hospital for an ECG and then wait for about two weeks for the results to get back to their GP. But now GPs have the results in minutes, meaning they can detect any problems at an earlier stage, and provide timely and preventative care.

Karen Greenwood, service improvement manager at the GMC Cardiac Network said: “The service has delivered clear cost savings and freed up acute and emergency healthcare resources. Carrying out 1,300 ECGs within the primary care setting has helped ease the burden on local acute hospitals.

“By providing cardiac monitoring, diagnosis and care at GP level, we’ve succeeded in dramatically reducing the number of out patient secondary care referrals. Patients get early diagnosis and care ensuring NHS resources are used most effectively.”

Patients in the area can also use arrhythmia recognition watches as part of the service.

These devices enable patients with suspected irregular heart palpitations to record and transmit a record of them when they occur. The interpretation service provides GPs with a clinical aid to diagnose whether the heart palpitations are indeed arrhythmia or not allowing appropriate care to be delivered.

However, Dr Lieberman says that although there are great benefits to the service, funding limitations mean that it can’t always be used with patients in the GP surgeries.

“I’d like every ECG to be done in this way. The problem is I can’t always spend my time waiting for the confirmation e-mail and going through the information with patients, as a GP, I’m often stretched for time. Similarly nurses do not work every day, and when they do, they are often very busy and cannot perform all the ECG’s that are necessary.

“More funding is needed to allow nurses to have more time to do these. PCT’s should see this as a great way of using their resources, saving the NHS money and getting the most out of practice based technology. It’s hard to be able to offer one patient the use of the service, whilst having to refer another patient due to a busy appointment list.”

Following the success of the initial one year pilot, the service is now being rolled out to a further four PCTs within the GMC network, covering 96 surgeries – Heywood, Middleton & Rochdale, Oldham, Eastern & Central Cheshire and Salford, extending the benefits to a wider patient base.

Links

Broomwell HealthWatch

© 2007 E-HEALTH-MEDIA LTD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Reader's Comments
Add a comment
Reader's Comments

1

slightly confused..

mary.hawking@nhs.net

19 Jul 07 21:07

While I would appreciate instant expert analysis of problematic ECGs, I am not sure that this system actually *is* cost effective, given that in most parts of the country, GPs have been doing ECGs in their surgeries for many years. Dr Lieberman says they can be used for diagnosing patients with chest pain symptoms, and thus reduce the need to refer patients to outpatients: I was taught that it takes time for ECG changes to develop in myocardial infarction, and patients with suspected MI should be referred immediately (clot busting - and even more, emergency angioplasty have a very small window of opportunity: delay to perform an ECG might be unfortunate..) and the diagnosis of angina still depends on an exercise ECG. The intermittent arrhythmia service *would* be useful: but would it justify the considerable expense of a host of experts sitting there waiting to read routine ECGs? Most PCTs are in deficit - and if not, have had to make cuts in community and other services. How about investing in training in reading ECGs?


2

Response to M Hawking comment

Claire@broomwell.com

25 Jul 07 16:07

As the provider of this service to the Gtr M/Cr Cardiac Network, we would just like to clarify the situation in that the service is most definitely cost effective. Whilst Dr Hawking is of course quite correct that patients showing signs of MI must be sent straight to A&E, there is a vast range of conditions which can be verified or otherwise assisted by a clinical evaluation together with a 12 lead ECG.

Having an immediate expert ECG evaluation and guidance can make a huge difference. It can pick up signs of a serious cardiac condition in patients not displaying symptoms, (in a minority of cases), and conversely it can also show that even in symptomatic patients there may be no cause for concern.

Having an ECG expertly allied to the clinical evaluation is an immensely useful tool and the proof is in the numbers. We have taken nearly 6,000 calls from doctors over the past 16 months, of which over 3,000 related to symptomatic patients and of these, around 88% did not require referral to hospital, (A&E or Outpatients).

The convenience to patients as well as the immense cost savings to the NHS are therefore self-evident. An ECG evaluation and report from Broomwell Healthwatch costs (just) £20.

Joshua Rowe


3

Response to slightly confused

michael.paynter@somersetpct.nhs.uk

28 Jul 07 08:07

I read with interest Mary Hawking's comments, she is quite correct that close correlation between clinical findings and 12 lead ECG anaylsis must go hand in hand. The acutely ill are easy to manage with or without an ECG, more challenging are the less acute patients with subtle but potentially devastating ECG changes - this is where expert ECG analysis is of immense clinical benifit.

However well clinicians 'used to be' at reading ECGs considerable skills deterioration inevitably occurs unless such activities are regularly undertaken. I would suggest that GPs and community nurse practitioners are not as adept at ECG analysis as their colleagues in cardiology or emergency medicine

Mike Paynter


4

Response to slightly confused

michael.paynter@somersetpct.nhs.uk

28 Jul 07 08:07

I read with interest Mary Hawking's comments, she is quite correct that close correlation between clinical findings and 12 lead ECG anaylsis must go hand in hand. The acutely ill are easy to manage with or without an ECG, more challenging are the less acute patients with subtle but potentially devastating ECG changes - this is where expert ECG analysis is of immense clinical benifit.

However well clinicians 'used to be' at reading ECGs considerable skills deterioration inevitably occurs unless such activities are regularly undertaken. I would suggest that GPs and community nurse practitioners are not as adept at ECG analysis as their colleagues in cardiology or emergency medicine

Mike Paynter

Search
News Features Jobs Newsletters

Featured_recruiters
Featured_recruiters