Welcome Guest | Login | Register | Why Register? |
Newsletter RSS Twitter
16 March 2010 | 21:51 GMT


HOME | CONTACT | NEWS | DOCUMENT LIBRARY | FEATURES | OPINION & ANALYSIS | EVENTS | RESEARCH REPORTS | CASE STUDIES

IT should make me more money

Tags: Community   GP   Quality   Solution  
12 May 2009

Dr Neil Paul

General practice is a business and I get annoyed when the press talks about GP salaries. We don’t get a salary. Partners are exactly that; a profit share partner in a business in which the magic equation is Income – Expenses = Profit.

General practices receive income from the NHS for providing services and from some non-NHS sources for things like insurance medicals and travel vaccines. A practice that has lots of income and few expenses makes a lot of profit and this is spread among its partners.

However, some practices do better than others and this is partly down to their enthusiasm for the business side. Meanwhile, expenses eat into any profit. Leaving the lights or computers on at night costs me money; real money. I actually take home less to live on each month if this happens.

Now, I could do a column on software that turns itself off at night and on low energy light bulbs. But having illustrated my point, I really want to talk about how general practice IT is concentrating too much on delivering government targets and not enough on improving our business effectiveness. I would also like to point out to IT companies there may be a gap in the market.

To be clear, I am not saying that good clinical care is unimportant. And most of the existing computer suppliers could rightly say that they reacted to the government’s Quality and Outcomes Framework and that this helped GP income. However, within the National Programme for IT in the NHS there has been little emphasis on software to help the business.

For example, I know of no good stock control software. My surgery is large; we have at least 25 consultation rooms that house doctors and nurses. They all have drugs, towels, gloves, couch rolls, soap and forms in them - and don’t forget the vaccines.

Most of the treatment rooms are over-stocked, as we tend to buy in bulk when we can, in the hope we can use stuff before it goes out of date. This represents a large capital expense that may not be needed.

I can’t believe a hospital does this on paper. My local corner shop has a bar code reader and a database that tells it when it is running low on something. Supply chain logistics is one of the great-unsung heroes of retail. I can’t believe that there isn’t a profit to be made here for a company that provides a stock control solution - perhaps linked with a bulk purchasing deal for practices signed up to the scheme.

Another example is staff. Most of the appointment systems I have seen are good at booking appointments. Some of the clever ones have all sorts of clever filters to find the next free appointment by doctor, nurse, type of clinic and so on. They offer online booking and text reminders.

What they aren’t as good at is producing reports on business or staff performance in a pre-determined, useful way. We use a stand-alone system that I consider to be one of the best on the market, but even this requires a lot of user effort.

At a recent cross-provider event, the managing director of my local community provider unit bemoaned the lack of information he had about what his staff were actually doing - or even know how many district nurses he had working at any one time.

He complimented general practice on our data; but I don’t feel I know that much, either. Why isn’t the appointment system linked to the payroll? The two often don’t seem to match up - but they should.

I would like to know - without spending hundreds of hours analysing data – things like which clinic is always under-booked and can be cut, which clinic always under-runs so we can reduce it and fit something else in, and which is always over-booked and needs expanding.

I am sure there are all sorts of other things I haven’t even thought of. Basically, I want an appointment system that acts as a business consultant and advises me where things are going wrong or where opportunities to make savings lie.

I would also like to explore linking appointments to disease. Then I could easily see things like how many post-op wound dressings are done in our treatment room and bill my local hospital for doing its work.

I would like to see pathways linked to patient journeys – with outliers highlighted. For example, why has one patient attended 30 times about hypertension, when on average such patients attend twice a year? Is this a difficult case that needs a referral - or does a junior member of staff have a learning need?

I am interested to hear of providers’ solutions. This may all seem a bit control freaky to some, but my profits have gone down the last two years because of government funding cuts; and it’s time to deal with expenses seriously.

 

Dr Paul is a full time GP working at the Ashfields primary care centre in Sandbach. He sits on his primary care trust’s professional executive committee and has a lead role for IM&T and practice-based commissioning.

Reader's Comments
Add a comment
Reader's Comments

1

How much? and who will make the decision?

12 May 09 20:05

Interesting set of requirements, how much is all this functionality worth?

For a system costing say £35K and £3k per annum to sustain, you would need to look to save c. £15K per year through efficiencies to get the payback you require over the long term. Have you looked at that side of the equation? Are you losing over £15K a year?


2

IT needed?

15 May 09 09:05

Whilst I agree with your sentiment, IT isn't a magic bullet. Some of the examples you give would be better solved by more staff training and investment in people. Give people in your practice the responsibility to manage the areas that you mention - they'll appreciate the chance to make a difference and your trust, and will repay you in ways that IT never could. Computers on the other hand take your time and money, and then you chuck them in the skip when they are a few years old.


3

I agree

20 May 09 12:05

I have to say i agree with pretty much everything that is said. I have only worked in primary care for little over 3 years and yet i am still surprised how a world wide leader in health provision is lagging behind the rest of the world when it comes to IT usage and data sharing. there are still surgeries that are not paper light, have never heard of a pocket PC or have implemented a scanning solution. I find that this is down to several factors which includes costs, an IT understanding but also the willingness to accept change. The use of IT eventually saves money, even it is pricey in the beginning try and look 3 years ahead when you cant imagine how to worked before you bought System X which has transformed the way you work. Yes most things are expensive when it comes to IT and yes equipment has to be replaced every few years but break down the cost savings in implementing a new system and you might be surprised that you save money by reducing errors or by speeding up a process therefore staff can do more in less time. How much time and money was spent on telephoning people before the invention of email or texting or the time spent in pulling the patients files before comprehensive clinical systems were developed, both solutions being revolutionary in their own right and have in some way or another saved the business money.

For instance 74% + of our patients use the check in screen for their appointments, it should be 100% but it never will be. We have been able to take one of the receptionist off the front desk and use them elsewhere in reception. The system costs a few hundred a year and costs a few thousand to set up but yet we effectively saved an entire staff salary as they are not needed on the front desk to click a single button when the patient arrives.


4

I agree

20 May 09 12:05

I have to say i agree with pretty much everything that is said. I have only worked in primary care for little over 3 years and yet i am still surprised how a world wide leader in health provision is lagging behind the rest of the world when it comes to IT usage and data sharing. there are still surgeries that are not paper light, have never heard of a pocket PC or have implemented a scanning solution. I find that this is down to several factors which includes costs, an IT understanding but also the willingness to accept change. The use of IT eventually saves money, even it is pricey in the beginning try and look 3 years ahead when you cant imagine how to worked before you bought System X which has transformed the way you work. Yes most things are expensive when it comes to IT and yes equipment has to be replaced every few years but break down the cost savings in implementing a new system and you might be surprised that you save money by reducing errors or by speeding up a process therefore staff can do more in less time. How much time and money was spent on telephoning people before the invention of email or texting or the time spent in pulling the patients files before comprehensive clinical systems were developed, both solutions being revolutionary in their own right and have in some way or another saved the business money.

For instance 74% + of our patients use the check in screen for their appointments, it should be 100% but it never will be. We have been able to take one of the receptionist off the front desk and use them elsewhere in reception. The system costs a few hundred a year and costs a few thousand to set up but yet we effectively saved an entire staff salary as they are not needed on the front desk to click a single button when the patient arrives.


5

You get annoyed when they talk about salaries?

20 May 09 13:05

From a patient's point of view, I get annoyed when: GPs drop their working hours to the point I have to take time off work to see one. GPs whinge about not being paid much, then turn up to work in BMW 7 series. The GP's wife is the practice manager, rather than someone with experience in running a business. Someone complains he doesn't know any good stock control software when Google will bring you up lots of options to investigate.

Now take your comments about this being a business one step further - you're providing a service, patients provide your income. You're now under the same constraints as a burger bar. Provide a decent service which will have people coming to your practice, or treat your patients like crap and watch them take your income to another GP. Simple isn't it?

No, IT is not a magic bullet, it's a tool, and like all other tools it requires some skill to be used efficiently.

This whole article is nothing short of an admission that primary care health orgs are simply not able to run in the manner they decided would earn them the most money when they last signed a deal with the DoH. Get the right staff in, stop employing your spouses in roles beyond their ability, and train your staff up so they can do more than just one job.

(Please note, above opinions come from over a decade of having to deal with GP surgeries, their business processes, payments and IT systems)

Most commented
Most commented
Research reports
Research reports
Top jobs
More
Top jobs

Featured_recruiters
Featured_recruiters