Welcome Guest | Login | Register | Why Register? |
Newsletter RSS Twitter
30 July 2010 | 11:57 GMT


HOME | CONTACT | NEWS | DOCUMENT LIBRARY | FEATURES | OPINION & ANALYSIS | EVENTS | RESEARCH REPORTS | CASE STUDIES
View reders comments View (2)
comments
Add a comment Add a
comment
Send to a friend Send to
a friend
Print this page Print

Lack of C+B slots increases again

Tags: Choose and Book   DH   GPs  

11 Aug 2009

Slot availability on Choose and Book has risen to affect almost one in five appointments after falling at the end of last year, EHI Primary Care can reveal.

NHS Connecting for Health said tackling slot availability was “its number one priority” for Choose and Book as figures show an increase in slot availability issues despite all national attempts to resolve the issue.

Latest Department of Health data shows the current national rate for appointment slot issues is 19% which has increased after falling to 12 or 13% at the end of last year.

Some hospitals have admitted that more than 50% of their appointments are not showing on Choose and Book and figures show performance by strategic health authority varies from 10.5% to 25.6%.

Dr Stephen Miller, national medical director for Choose and Book, said 5,000 to 6,000 patients a day were being inconvenienced by being unable to book an appointment on the electronic system as well as GPs and support staff.

He told EHI Primary Care: “It continues to be our biggest implementation issue by far and one of our main difficulties is that we are not totally clear why it is happening.”

Dr Miller said it was difficult to make any correlation between areas with low slot availability figures and actions they had taken to achieve that result.

However, he called on hospital trust chief executives to get fully involved in sorting out slot availability. He added: “Chief executives need to grab this and run with it. It needs top level buy-in.”

Dr Miller said latest figures showed that 16 NHS organisations had slot availability issues of less than 4%, 109 organisations had between 4% and 19% and 86 organisations had slot availability issues of more than 20%.

Among those with high slot availability issues is St Helens and Knowsley Hospitals. According to a July board report to Halton and St Helens PCT the acute trust is the sixth lowest performing trust in the NHS with a slot availability of less than one in two.

The board report adds: “More than 50% of all patients who contact the National Call Centre to book an appointment at St Helens and Knowsley Hospitals are unable to do so. In comparison, Warrington and Halton Hospitals have slots available so that nine out of 10 patients can book a slot using the system.”

CfH said individual hospitals were responsible for ensuring that appointment slots for outpatient appointments are available through Choose and Book. “Failure to publish sufficient appointments slots on the Choose and Book system is not a result of the technology,” it added.

It said the NHS standard acute services contract makes it clear that hospitals are obliged to accept all clinically appropriate referrals and cannot turn referrals away by, for example, not displaying all slots on Choose and Book or limited availability to meet the 18 week referral to treatment target,

It said a new 18 Weeks and Choose and Book toolkit had been released to help trusts understand their demand and proactively manage their capacity and that weekly reports were also available for NHS organisations to review their performance both for Choose and Book and appointment slot issues.

CfH said 54% of first outpatient appointments were booked via Choose and Book in May, the latest month for which figures are available.

Fiona Barr

Related Articles
Related Articles

© 2009 E-HEALTH-MEDIA LTD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Reader's Comments
Add a comment
Reader's Comments

1

slot access

19 Aug 09 09:08

In trying to use choose and book for two referrals recently I have found that there is minimal access to appointments. For one I was eventually told that to manage waiting times slots for popular consultants were not available on choose and book. Does this mean we are only being allowed to see 'inferior' clinicians? For the other (an urgent referral) I was told they were unable to offer an appointment - that was two weeks ago and my urgent appointment is 'lost' in the quagmire of choose and book.

I do not know where the 'blame' lies but as a patient I am totally frustrated, my GP and the practice secretary are exhausted from the the problems and the cconsultants do not appear very happy either as one letter of apology indicates.

Both referrals were faxed to the consultant and appointments arranged and received in the post in less than 2 weeks.

For me letter and fax is far superior to choose and book.


2

Don't blame Choose and Book

26 Aug 09 15:08

As usual it is the software that gets the blame for the inept way hospitals are handling their appointment slots.

To the poster above. IF the hospital were able to give you appointments by letter or fax then those VERY same appointments should be on Choose and Book.

4 years on and the innefficiency of the USERS of the software is there for all to see. Please stop blaming this excellent piece of software !

Search
News Features Jobs Newsletters
EHI Primary Care Tweets
EHI Primary Care Tweets

Featured_recruiters
Featured_recruiters